Official Journal of the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS)
Researchers and subject | Method | Results | Comparison |
---|---|---|---|
(Khodakarami et al., 2011) | Conventional kriging and exponential modeling | Zoned the distribution of heavy metals including zinc and copper | Trend results are consistent |
Harati et al. (2010) | Simulation of Hydrus model | The findings show a high concentration of lead in the study area | Consistent with the results of this study |
Conventional kriging and exponential modeling | were reported that the spherical model for the lead element and the exponential model for the copper element was the best fit | Good agreement between them | |
Barzin M. et al., 2015 | Ordinary kriging and exponential modeling | The permissible standard of agricultural soils in Iran has been introduced by the Environment Agency for these three elements are 75, 200, and 110 mg/kg, respectively | Consistent with the results of this study |
WHO standards in agricultural soils | Presentation was standard | The concentrations of nickel and copper in study area, shows there is no contamination of these two elements in the area | Agricultural soils of study area for lead, copper, and nickel are less than the maximum permissible levels |
Toth G. et al., (2016) | According to the WHO standard | The maximum permissible levels in agricultural soils for lead, copper, and nickel are reported to be 60, 100, and 50 mg/kg | Agricultural soils of study area for lead, copper, and nickel are less than the maximum permissible levels |
Fard Samiei et al. (2016) | Remote sensing techniques | Was reported almost uniform concentration of the element nickel in the entire study area | Good agreement between them |