Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS)

Table 1 List of all the recalibrated radiocarbon OSL ages and references of the samples collected from the trenches excavated by previous workers

From: Overestimation of the earthquake hazard along the Himalaya: constraints in bracketing of medieval earthquakes from paleoseismic studies

Trenches Sample number Measured radiocarbon age Calibrated ages cal AD Mean (µ) References
Hajipur      Malik et al. (2010a)
 Undeformed unit JMT6 300 ± 40 1426–1700 1707  
Kangra      
 Undeformed unit JNMPC10 110 ± 30 1681–1938 1817 Malik et al. (2015)
Bhatpur      Kumahara and Jayangondaperumal (2013)
 Undeformed unit BHA-117 480 ± 40 1327–1476 1429  
Chandigarh      Kumar et al. (2006)
 Undeformed unit PAN-03 665 ± 40 1270–1397 1333  
Kala Amb      Kumar et al. (2001)
  C18 620 ± 30 1292–1401 1346  
  C15 420 ± 40 1420–1630 1492  
Rampur Ganda      Kumar et al. (2006)
 Undeformed unit AB08 530 ± 35 1316–1443 1393  
Lal Dang      Kumar et al. (2006)
 Undeformed unit LDT-31 375 ± 25 1447–1631 1526  
Ramnagar      Kumar et al. (2006)
 Undeformed unit BR-06 695 ± 35 1444–1634 1526  
Ramnagar      Rajendran et al. (2015)
 Undeformed unit P-1 727 ± 16 1264–1287 1276  
Kaladungi      Malik et al. (2016)
 Deformed unit GDC06 80 ± 30 1690–1926 1826  
 Undeformed unit GDC010 250 ± 30 1521–1939 1676  
Koliabas      Mugnier et al. (2005)
 Deformed River Terrace AA50068 775 ± 35 1190–1285 1246  
Mahara      Lavé et al. (2005)
 Undeformed unit M2-12 880 ± 40 1036–1245 1143  
Sir Khola      Sapkota et al. (2013); Bollinger et al. (2014)
  SIR08-05 645 ± 35 1280–1398 1340  
Panijhora      Mishra et al. (2016)
 Deformed P10 990 ± 30 989–1153 1060  
Chalsa      Kumar et al. (2010)
 Deformed C-7 840 ± 30 1059–1264 1201  
Nameri      Kumar et al. (2010)
 Deformed N-22 895 ± 35 1039–1215 1126  
Harmutty      Kumar et al. (2010)
  H13S 670 ± 35 1270–1394 1330  
  1. The recalibration is carried out through OxCal 4.2 online program; it provides the probable calendar date range along with the uncertainty and the mean value. All the ages are processed at 94.5% confidence level